WARNING πŸ‘‰ The Fed Has Created A Monster Bubble It Can No Longer Control - financialanalysis


Popular Posts

Monday, February 17, 2020

WARNING πŸ‘‰ The Fed Has Created A Monster Bubble It Can No Longer Control

The Fed must now accept responsibility for what happens in the end-game of the Moral-Hazard Monster Bubble it created.
Contrary to popular opinion, the Federal Reserve didn't set out to create a Monster Bubble that has escaped its control. Also contrary to popular opinion, the Fed will be unable to "never let stocks fall ever again--ever!" for the simple reason that the monster it has created-- a monster mania of moral hazard in which all risk has vanished because the Fed will never let stocks fall ever again--ever!--is now beyond its control.
And that's a problem for the Fed, which above all else needs control of interest rates, financial markets and the economy.
The problem is that bubbles always pop, and they pop regardless of what central banks do. This is contrary to the popular opinion that if only the Fed had saved Lehman Brothers, the Global Financial Meltdown of 2008 would never have happened.
Wrong. Bubbles pop when too much risky debt unbacked by collateral is issued to marginal borrowers who inevitably default, triggering massive losses in the financial sector, an equally massive unwind of speculative debt and risky gambles and a deep recession as all the debt-fueled malinvestment dries up and blows away.
The 2008 Global Financial Meltdown was the inevitable result of subprime and other debt bubbles bursting which then triggered a panic to unwind trillions of dollars in high-risk speculative gambles in stocks, real estate, junk bonds, etc.
The Fed has another problem which it hasn't been able to solve despite 12 years of trying: to save the financial system from collapse, the Fed has to re-inflate the debt-fueled speculative mania that just popped from unstable excesses of debt, leverage and moral-hazard speculative fever, all piled on a diminishing foundation of actual collateral.
We can see the manic progression of each Fed rescue in this chart: note the compression of time as the periods between each Fed rescue shrink and the spectacular rocket-ship ride of debt, leverage and moral-hazard speculative fever adds another 1,000 points to the S&P 500 in ever shorter manic stampedes of front-running the next the Fed will never let stocks fall ever again--ever! bubble.
Advances that recently took years now take months. The 700 point advance that required 4.5 years back in the previous bubble of 2003-2007 now required only 4.5 months. The next iteration is 700 points in 4.5 weeks, then in 4.5 days, and then the oblivion of collapse.That's a total range of $0.017 trillion--essentially signal noise. This strongly suggests that the Fed is hoping--foolishly, of course, as it stumbles around in a hubris-soaked fantasy that it can really, really, really control the moral-hazard monster it created--to keep stocks on a "permanently high plateau" which somehow avoids the two disasters that history records as inevitable: either an immediate collapse of the bubble or a Fed-fueled "rescue" that adds another 1,000 points in six months, and then another 1,000 points in three months, and then a collapse that cannot be rescued, as the entire financial system implodes.
The Fed managers are foolish but not stupid. They realize they cannot let the moral-hazard mania move into the phase where an irretrievable collapse becomes inevitable.
The problem here is history has never recorded a bubble which settled magically onto a "permanently high plateau" and stayed there for months or years. So the Fed has finally reached the point of no return: either it accepts a painful bursting of the monster moral-hazard bubble it has created or it lets the monster lead the stampede over the cliff to a financial collapse that the Fed can't rescue with the usual tools of lowering interest rates and bailing out banks.
It's worth recalling that the Fed can't actually force insolvent lenders to lend more money to insolvent borrowers. It also can't squeeze blood from stones; insolvent borrowers default, period. The losses can be buried in the Fed balance sheet but that doesn't create income for shuttered enterprises or laid-off workers, or generates taxes for local governments watching their tax base melt away.
Even the hubris-soaked fools in the Fed realize this bubble has disconnected from financial realities. One glance at the operating income of Apple shows that everyone's favorite stock has soared even as operating income has been essentially flat for years. There's a phrase for this: disconnect from reality, all driven by the manic certitude that the Fed will never let stocks fall ever again--ever!After 12 long years of ever-riskier bubble-blowing, the Fed is now boxed in. Instead of reassuring markets that the next 1,000 points are guaranteed and all in only a few more months of mania, the Fed will either have to offer false assurances while it attempts an impossible "soft landing", i.e. a controlled deflation of the Monster Bubble, or it grimly accepts that a 1,000 point decline in the S&P 500 now is a better choice than an implosion later if the Monster Bubble breaks completely free and rampages higher even as the Fed pulls the plug.
Moral-Hazard Monster Bubbles cannot be controlled. Human greed guarantees that the Fed will never let stocks fall ever again--ever! will generate self-reinforcing stampedes of speculative mania that no long respond to the signals of the Fed balance sheet.
At this point, the Fed will be hoist on its own petard: by claiming god-like control of interest rates, financial markets and the economy, the Fed must now accept responsibility for what happens in the end-game of the Moral-Hazard Monster Bubble it created: either allow a 25% to 30% wipeout of speculative excess now or feed the final stampede to financial collapse.
It's not a happy choice, but if we're honest (gasp), there really is no choice: the Fed cannot let the moral-hazard mania run to complete collapse, which is now only one iteration away.Growing U.S. National Debt Could Cause Economic & Social Crisis,,Rising U.S. National Debt Could Lead to Dire Consequences
Mark my words: the U.S. national debt is going to create a lot of troubles in years ahead. If it’s not controlled now, there could be dire consequences.
You see, long-term debt is bad. If anyone tells you otherwise, don’t listen to them. You can’t expect good results if there’s a lot of debt and it’s increasing. It’s that simple.At the time of this writing, the national debt stands at $23.2 trillion.And it has been growing at a very rapid pace.
In the beginning of 2008, the U.S. national debt was $9.2 trillion. So, in matter of 12 years or so, the debt has increased 152%. In nominal terms, the U.S. is hands down the most indebted nation in the world.
Sadly, it doesn’t look like the debt figure will come down anytime soon.
Step back a little.
How does the national debt grow? It all starts with the U.S. government incurring a budget deficit (it spends more than it receives in taxes and fees). Then the government has to borrow to pay for its expenses (and pay interest). The more the U.S. government borrows, the higher the U.S. national debt becomes.
Over the past decade or so, the U.S. government has been spending without remorse.
Just recently, even when the U.S. economy was doing fine, the U.S. government was running a budget deficit of close to $1.0 trillion. In 2020, we could see another budget deficit of $1.0 trillion.
Here’s the worst part; there’s no balanced budget in sight.
So, the U.S. national debt could be much worse in the coming years. It could even soar to $30.0–$35.0 trillion (if not more) by the end of this decade.
The Problem
In the short term, rising national debt isn’t really an issue. But know this, in the long term, immense national debt leads to severe consequences.
Now, you really have to ask this question: who’s on hook for this debt, and how will the U.S. government ever pay it off? The national debt figures we see are not imaginary numbers. The debt needs to be paid at some point down the road.
Dear reader, this is where the problem comes. American citizens are on the hook for this massive U.S. national debt.
Imagine this: if lenders to the U.S. government all of a sudden come out and say, “Give us our money back,” what do you think the U.S. government will have to do?
The government could be forced to increase taxes and fees on all sorts of things. Plus, it would have to cut a lot of programs that the government currently provides, such as social security, Medicare, food stamps, etc.
For average Americans, this could be devastating. They are already struggling. New taxes and cuts to essential services could really hurt their well-being.
I will end with this: the higher the U.S. national debt goes, the odds of an economic and social crisis increase exponentially.

No comments:

Post a Comment